Media BuyingHello Genius Auto
Data as of Aug 20, 5:45 AMRevenue
Funnel
Efficiency
Campaigns
Only $0.00 of spend in this period — too little to judge campaign performance.
No campaign activity in this period.
Click feedsHello Genius Auto only
| Feed / Tier | Avg bid | Bids | Clicks | Revenue | RPU |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$7.80 ↓0.9% | 94 ↑104.3% | 11 ↑22.2% | $115.13 ↑26.1% | $10.47 ↑3.2% | |
$9.29 ↑17.5% | 49 ↑122.7% | 8 ↑300.0% | $52.39 ↑689.0% | $6.55 ↑97.3% | |
$1.74 ↓16.3% | 59 ↑118.5% | 0 — | $0.00 — | — — | |
$1.71 ↑53.0% | 80 ↑150.0% | 0 — | $0.00 — | — — |
Only 19 paid clicks in this period — too few to judge feed performance.
Each figure shows its change against the same figure last period, so a feed paying less per click reads differently from one being sent fewer clicks — revenue alone moves the same either way. Avg bid averages every bid into the feed, winning or not: market context, not earnings. RPU is what a click actually paid. Expanding a feed shows its own tiers — QuoteWizard’s Platinum and Diamond, SwitchBoard’s Email and SEM, numeric ids for Arity and QuinStreet. Those come straight from the payout and so, unlike the campaign view, need no attribution and add up exactly; bids are not tiered and stay blank there. Tier names are each feed’s own and are not comparable between feeds. For which campaigns and ads earned this, open sources on a campaign in the Campaigns section. A blank change means no activity at all last period, which is not the same as a fall from zero.
Lead buyersHello Genius Auto only
| Buyer / Campaign / Ad | Avg bid | Bids | Sent | Sold | Accept | Revenue | RPU |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$4.03 ↑127.1% | 18 ↑100.0% | 4 ↑33.3% | 1 — | 25.0% — | $10.83 — | $10.83 — | |
$0.60 ↑10.2% | 18 ↑100.0% | 6 ↑100.0% | 1 — | 16.7% — | $1.27 — | $1.27 — | |
$1.00 no change | 18 ↑100.0% | 10 ↑150.0% | 1 no change | 10.0% ↓60.0% | $1.00 no change | $1.00 no change | |
$2.76 ↑34.2% | 18 ↑100.0% | 13 ↑160.0% | 0 — | 0.0% — | $0.00 — | — — | |
$1.27 ↑102.1% | 18 ↑100.0% | 9 ↑200.0% | 0 — | 0.0% — | $0.00 — | — — | |
$0.95 ↓26.6% | 15 ↑114.3% | 1 ↓50.0% | 0 — | 0.0% — | $0.00 — | — — | |
$1.89 ↑109.7% | 18 ↑100.0% | 1 — | 0 — | 0.0% — | $0.00 — | — — | |
$0.12 — | 18 ↑100.0% | 1 — | 0 — | 0.0% — | $0.00 — | — — | |
— — | 18 ↑100.0% | — — | 0 — | — — | $0.00 — | — — | |
$0.86 ↓61.0% | 18 ↑100.0% | — — | 0 — | — — | $0.00 — | — — | |
— — | 18 ↑100.0% | — — | 0 — | — — | $0.00 — | — — | |
— — | 16 ↑128.6% | — — | 0 — | — — | $0.00 — | — — | |
$0.00 — | 18 ↑100.0% | — — | 0 — | — — | $0.00 — | — — |
Needs attention25 leads — 56% of everything sent — went to 5 buyers that bought none: Everquote (13), Datalot (9), Compare (1), and others.
Zero sales from an established buyer is more often a broken postback than total rejection. Pull their own delivery report and compare their sold count to ours — if theirs is also zero it is a lead-quality problem, if not, revenue is being under-reported everywhere on this page.
How to act on this
Establish whether the leads were rejected or the sales were never reported.
- Not a Meta problem. Pull the buyer's own delivery report for the same dates and compare their sold count to the one here. This single comparison decides everything else.
- If theirs is also zero, it is lead quality or a filter mismatch — ask which filter, and whether leads are being rejected at ping or at post. Those have different fixes.
- If theirs is NOT zero, the postback is broken and every revenue figure on this page is understated, not only theirs. That makes it the highest-priority item in the account, ahead of anything in Ads Manager.
Watch out: Cutting the buyer before checking loses the volume AND leaves the reporting bug in place for the next one.
This account runs under Meta’s Financial products and services special ad category — its own description covers “insurance services” — so the guidance above is written to work inside these limits rather than around them:
- Age is fixed at 18–65+ and cannot be narrowed. (Financial-services advertisers in Europe are the one exception; US accounts are not.)
- Gender is fixed to all genders.
- Some detailed targeting options — demographics, behaviours and interests — are unavailable.
- No ZIP or postal-code targeting. Any city, address or pin must include everything within a 15-mile radius.
- Lookalike audiences are unavailable.
- Saved audiences cannot be used or created, so every ad set is built by hand — which is why duplicating beats rebuilding.
- Custom audiences DO still work, provided the selection is not discriminatory. They are the one audience tool you keep, and the basis of converter exclusions and retargeting.
- Copy naming a guaranteed rate or a specific saving gets rejected, and repeated rejections restrict the account.
Each figure shows its change against the same figure last period, so a buyer paying less per lead reads differently from one accepting fewer. Accept is sold ÷ sent, this buyer’s own acceptance rate — not the dashboard’s sold rate, which spans every buyer. RPU is revenue per lead sold, so price and acceptance stay separable. A row with bids but no sends is a buyer in the auction receiving nothing. Expanded rows cover only what traces back to an ad — about half of pings and sends carry a resolvable identity — so the rates there read higher than the buyer’s own row: traffic that resolves is traffic that tracks, and it converts better.
DemographicsHello Genius Auto only
| Education / Campaign / Ad | Feed bid | Lead bid | Leads | Sold | Sold rate | Avg lead rev | Avg feed rev | Rev/lead | Cost/lead | Net/lead | Total rev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $4.57 | $1.14 | 16 | 2 | 12.5% | — | — | — | — | — | $0.00 | |
| $6.54 | $0.69 | 5 | 1 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | $0.00 |
Only 21 leads with a known education — too few to compare segments.
Leads are counted in the window they arrived, and a sale counts toward them whenever it lands — so a demographic is judged on the leads it produced, not on the day money happened to arrive. Recent windows therefore understate sold rate. Sold rate is coloured against this scope’s 14.3% baseline, and only once a row has at least 40 leads — below that a rate is chance, not a finding. Feed bid is dollars per click into the click feeds and Lead bid is dollars per lead offered by lead buyers — two different markets valuing the same person, never averaged together. Avg sold is confirmed revenue per lead sold, not the price field on the lead row.
Rev/lead, Cost/lead and Net/lead are measured over the same population — the leads that resolve to an ad, since spend exists only at ad grain and a lead with no ad has no cost to carry. Cost charges an ad’s whole spend across the leads it produced, so it is deliberately conservative: that same spend also bought clicks from people who never became a lead, and their click revenue is excluded from both sides. Net therefore reads worse here than the blended business does. Expanding shows only leads that trace back to an ad, so campaigns sum to less than the row above them.
TimingHello Genius Auto only
| Hour | Feed bid | Feed bids | Lead bid | Lead bids | Clicks | Click rev | Leads | Sold | Sold rate | Avg sold |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | — | — | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| — | — | — | — | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| — | — | — | — | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| — | — | — | — | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| — | — | — | — | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| — | — | — | — | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| — | — | — | — | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| — | — | — | — | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| $10.48 | 16 | $0.66 | 13 | 5 | $6.60 | 1 | — | 0.0% | — | |
| $5.59 | 15 | $0.86 | 12 | 3 | $4.13 | 1 | — | 0.0% | — | |
| $4.27 | 27 | $0.68 | 26 | 6 | $14.69 | 2 | — | 0.0% | — | |
| $6.04 | 30 | $0.84 | 26 | 9 | $13.05 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% | $1.00 | |
| $5.26 | 42 | $1.50 | 23 | 9 | $32.61 | 3 | — | 0.0% | — | |
| $6.66 | 12 | $2.73 | 13 | 5 | $26.54 | 1 | 1 | 100.0% | $10.83 | |
| — | — | — | — | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| $3.13 | 10 | $0.84 | 13 | 9 | — | 1 | — | 0.0% | — | |
| $3.54 | 15 | $0.71 | 13 | 4 | $3.38 | 1 | — | 0.0% | — | |
| $3.68 | 37 | $0.27 | 26 | 18 | $9.27 | 3 | — | 0.0% | — | |
| $4.51 | 10 | $1.35 | 13 | 24 | $8.39 | 1 | — | 0.0% | — | |
| $4.24 | 55 | $0.93 | 38 | 15 | $25.59 | 4 | — | 0.0% | — | |
| $6.16 | 13 | $1.17 | 13 | 7 | $23.27 | 1 | 1 | 100.0% | $1.27 | |
| — | — | — | — | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| — | — | — | — | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| — | — | — | — | 13 | — | — | — | — | — |
Not enough leads per hour yet to separate real patterns from chance.
Buckets are Mountain time, DST included — the warehouse stores UTC, and raw UTC hours would sit six or seven hours off what the business actually experienced. Feed bid is dollars per click into the click feeds; Lead bid is dollars per lead offered by lead buyers. Different units, never averaged together. Bids and clicks are bucketed by when they happened; leads, sold and avg sold by when the lead arrived, so a late-night lead that sells at 9am counts toward the night — the question here is what traffic from an hour is worth. Sold rate is coloured against the 14.3% baseline once a bucket has 25+ leads. There is no cost column: Facebook spend is ingested at daily grain, so CPL and ROAS cannot be split by hour without an hourly pull.
Expand a hour to see it per counterparty — which feed was paying then, which buyer was accepting. A buyer that is both appears once, with both halves filled. Inside an expanded row, Leads means leads sent to that buyer and sold rate is their acceptance of them, where the row above counts every lead that arrived — same question, narrower denominator. Those figures are bucketed by when we contacted the buyer, which is the clock a daypart rule acts on.
Before switching a feed off for an hour, check the volume behind it: a single fortnight gives each weekday two or three samples, and each hour fewer still.